I love Polly!

And a "poor" again. This procedure has system, there is someone, who don't like hoops.

Hm. I didn´t rated any of the polly pictures... but personaly i would say that the picture itself technically is an average... low res, grainy. etc. etc.

@stomcrow: This is a good ponit: Should the rating include the picture quality or should the rating interpret the picture what we could see, if the picture would have been taken under best conditions with best hardware and best photographic skins?

I think, it is legitimately, to give e.g. blurry pictues a lower rating. Sometimes a picture is so awesome (because of monster-big hoops), that I oversee bad resolutions, blurring etc.

So, it's acceptable, to give Polly an average (but I voted "awesome"), but "poor"? If you look at the newest pics, there is a system behind this, somebody browses trough the pictures and gives a "Poor" one after another, regardless of whether the pic is good or not.

>this is a good ponit:

typing error: should be read as "point"